Criticism on the Opinions of Modernists of Subcontinent in Tafsīr Tibyān ul Qur’ān; An Analytical Study

تفسیر تبیان الفرقان میں برصغیر کے متجددین کی آراء پر نقد؛ تجزیاتی مطالعہ

  • Asghar Ali Khan Institute of Islamic Studies, Mirpur University of Science & Technology, Mirpur, Azad Kashmir
  • Shahbaz Shabbir PhD Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, University of Gujrat, Gujrat
Keywords: Sub Continent, Tafsīr Tibyān ul Furqān, Parvaiz


Ghulam Rasool Saeedi is a well-known and famous interpreter of Quranic revelations. He has criticized modern, out of context and illegal interpretation of Holy Qur'ān. One of his Two Famous Tafasīrs, Tibyān ul Furqān is replete with examples of criticism on his contemporary interpreters of Holy Qur'ān. He has presented many authentic sources to prove his stance. To prove his research, he has cited form Holy Qur'ān, Sunnah and Hadith, Jurisprudential sources of all four sects of Fiqa and even form the books of those, on them he has criticized. A very rare and appreciable thing in his writings is that he is unbiased, neutral, careful and moderate person while using pen. In this article the explicit concepts of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Ghulam Ahmad Parvaiz and others have been rejected with the arguments given by Allama Saeedi in His Tafsīr Tibyān ul Furqān and the Majority of the Scholars and Muslim thinkers.