China's Authoritarian Ascendancy vs. US Democratic Dominance: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

China’s authoritarian ascendency, characterized by state owned enterprises, technological development and dictatorial governance structure is contrary to US democratic dominance, enshrined in promotion of democratic norms and values, private owned enterprises, human rights and democratic governance structure.  This paper is aimed to make a comparative analysis of both US and China’s models by evaluating their domestic and foreign policies to identify the major areas of competition and cooperation such as global governance and institutional influence, economic statecraft and trade policies, soft power and cultural diplomacy, human rights, and democratic promotion. This study will examine the consequences of their competition on global security and conflict dynamics, democratic justice and human rights, international cooperation, multilateral control, the future of U.S.-China relations, and global governance. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of each approach in achieving its respective goals, taking into account regional and international norms, domestic political contexts and legitimacy. The paper will examine the complex dynamics of great power competition highlighting the challenges and opportunities produced by the interplay between authoritarian vs democratic dominance, in the light of neoliberalism. The research methodology of the paper is be based on comparative analysis. Finally, this research offers recommendations for policymakers navigating the evolving global authoritarian vs democratic landscape to promote for a peaceful and stable order.

Keywords: US Democratic Dominance, Chinese authoritarian ascendancy, Neoliberalism, Global Governance, Human Rights.