Methodological Approaches of Contemporary Seerah Writings in the West: An Analytical Study
Abstract
Western perspectives, which view and portray Eastern religions and cultures through a biased social framework, often perpetuate stereotypes and misconceptions about the Islamic world. In the contemporary era, Western writers have introduced new perspectives and analytical frameworks to the study of Seerah. Western methodologies have evolved and adapted to the changing dynamics of global interactions and the complexities of cultural exchanges. The study of the Seerah (biography of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ) by Western scholars has been a significant area of academic interest. They have approached the Seerah with various methodologies that often reflect their distinct cultural, intellectual, and sometimes ideological perspectives. This article explores the predominant methodologies employed by western writers, such as the historical-critical method, comparative study, and textual criticism. The historical-critical method analyzes the authenticity of Islamic sources, while textual criticism focuses on the evolution and transmission of Seerah texts. The comparison method involves evaluating different sources or perspectives side by side to identify similarities, differences, and underlying patterns; these methodologies lead to skepticism about established Islamic traditions. Critical analysis of these methodologies identifies the biases, evaluates their credibility, and enhances knowledge that provides insights into the complexities of interpreting historical texts.
References
Abror, Muhamad, and Awalia Rahma. "Sira Nabawiyya: Historiography of the Prophet Muhammad by Three Modern Writers." Buletin Al-Turas 30, no. 1 (2024): 25-38. doi:10.15408/bat.v30i1.30008.
al-Azharī, Muḥammad Karam Shāh. Ḍiyāʾ al-Nabī. Lahore: Ziyāʾ al-Qurʾān, 2004.
Armstrong, Karen. Muhammad: Prophet for Our Time. Mizan Pustaka, 2013.
Ayaz, Hacer. "The difference in historical methodology between Juynboll and Motzik related to Hadith." no. 1 (2015): 41-46.
Azarian, Reza. "Potentials and Limitations of Comparative Method in Social Science." International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1, no. 4 (2011): 113-125.
Azmi, Ahmad S., Mohd Y. Ismail, Zulhilmi Mohamed Nor, Amiruddin Mohd Sobali, and Amran Abdul Halim. "Qur’ānic References in Sīra Literature: A Prolegomenon to The Orientalist Studies." Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah 12, no. 13 (2017): 70-78. doi:10.33102/jmqs.v12i13.8.
Babar, Ghulam Hussain. "Orientalist’s methodology in the study of Sirah: A Critical Analysis."
Brown, Jonathan A. C. Hadith: Muhammad's Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. London: Oneworld Publications, 2009.
Crone, Patricia, and Michael Cook. Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Donner, Fred M. Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Educational Wave. "Pros and Cons of Comparative Research." https://www.educationalwave.com/pros-and-cons-of-comparative-research/.
Encyclopedia Britannica. "Historiography - Islamic, Sources, Writing." Last modified September 18, 1998. https://www.britannica.com/topic/historiography/Islamic-historiography.
Encyclopedia Britannica. "Textual Criticism | Definition, Examples, & Facts." Last modified September 18, 1998. https://www.britannica.com/topic/textual-criticism.
Fatima, Tehreem, and Aqsa Tasgheer. "The Rationalistic-Critical Approach of Orientalists in Seerah Writings: An Exploratory Study of Modern Trends." Al-Wifāq 5, no. 1 (2022): 85-97. doi:10.55603/alwifaq.v5i1.e7.
Gurry, Peter. "Is textual criticism theologically safe?" Evangelical Textual Criticism (blog), August 8, 2019. https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2019/08/is-textual-criticism-theologically-safe.html.
Ibn al Hyderabadee. "Sources of Seerah." Last modified July 19, 2006. https://ibnalhyderabadee.wordpress.com/2006/04/15/sources-of-seerah/.
Jameelah, Maryam. Islam and Orientalism. Adam Publishers, 2007.
Khan, Sajid S., and Sajid Hameed. "Orientalism and Muslim Historical Critical Methods." Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 4, no. 1 (2014): 75-81. doi:10.32350/jitc.41.05.
Lings, Martin. Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources. 1991.
Motzki, Harald. "The Question of the Authenticity of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article." Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins (2003): 211-257. doi:10.1163/9789047401575_013.
Motzki, Harald. The Biography of Muhammad: The Issue of the Sources. 2000.
Soulen, Richard N., and R. K. Soulen. Handbook of Biblical Criticism. James Clarke & Co., 2002.
SpringerLink. "Comparative Studies." https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1197-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lubna Iftikhar and Dr. Amir Hayat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
