Rethinking the Relationship between Confucianism and Daoism
An Thematic Comparative Analytical Study
Abstract
The relationship between Confucianism and Daoism has long been interpreted through two competing frameworks: one emphasizing fundamental opposition and the other proposing unity within difference. This paper evaluates these interpretive models through a comparative thematic study of shared philosophical categories, including Dao, De, Ren, Wu Wei and the presents the mutual perceptions of their respective main figures. By analyzing classical sources alongside major modern scholarly interpretations, the study argues that Confucianism and Daoism represent divergent yet internally related developments within a shared intellectual tradition. Their differences arise primarily from levels of discourse and philosophical orientation rather than structural contradiction. The paper concludes that the “unity in difference” model provides a more coherent explanatory framework for understanding the historical and conceptual relationship between the two traditions.
References
Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. Dao De Jing: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books, 2003.
Confucius. The Analects. Translated by D. C. Lau. London: Penguin, 1979.
Confucius. The Doctrine of the Mean. Translated by James Legge. New York: Dover, 1971.
Fingarette, Herbert. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002.
Laozi. Tao Te Ching. Translated by D. C. Lau. London: Penguin, 1963.
Mencius. Mencius. Translated by D. C. Lau. London: Penguin, 1970.
Schwartz, Benjamin I. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Slingerland, Edward. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Tu, Weiming. Centrality and Commonality: An Essay on Confucian Religiousness. Albany: SUNY Press, 1989.
Van Norden, Bryan W. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Xunzi. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Translated by John Knoblock. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.
Zhuangzi. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. Translated by Burton Watson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhili Ma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
