Review Policy

To ensure accuracy, SJSPM implements a double-blind peer-review procedure. When reviewers do not know the name or affiliation of an author, they write their reports anonymously and these reports are forwarded to the author intact.

The advantage of double-blind peer-review system is that it guarantees authors that their works are judged on their scientific content alone and not on their other components. It stands for the fact that reviewers would come up with an unbiased view and then can check whether the content is original and valid and has some significance or not.

In fact, the manuscripts are usually evaluated not by one but two or more scientist-experts. The contributors examine if the submitted work is a reliable article, exhaustive and does not replicate other published works. If the reviewers suggest the manuscript as it is is a resembles of quality for publication, the editorial team will make a final decision.