تفسیر تبیان الفرقان میں برصغیر کے متجددین کی آرا پر نقد: تجزیاتی مطالعہ

Criticism on the Opinions of Modernists of Subcontinent in Tafsīr Tibyān ul Qur’ān; An Analytical Study

Authors

  • اصغر علی خان, ڈاکٹر اسسٹنٹ پروفیسر، انسٹی ٹیوٹ آ ف اسلامک سٹڈیز، میرپور یونیورسٹی آف سائنس اینڈ ٹیکنالوجی، (MUST)میرپورآزادکشمیر
  • شہباز شبیر لیکچرار اسلامیات، محکمہ تعلیم، آزاد کشمیر۔ پی ایچ ڈی اسکالر، شعبہ علوم اسلامیہ ، یونیورسٹی آف گجرات، گجرات

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52461/ulm-e-islmia.v27i2.408

Keywords:

Sub-Continent, Tafsīr Tibyān ul Furqān, Parvaiz

Abstract

Ghulām Rasūl Saʻīdī is a well-known and famous interpreter of Qur’ānic revelations. He has criticized modern, out of context and illegal interpretation of Holy Qur’ān. One of his Two Famous Tafāsīrs, Tibyān ul Furqān is replete with examples of criticism on his contemporary interpreters of Holy Qur’ān. He has presented many authentic sources to prove his stance. To prove his research, he has cited form Holy Qur’ān, Sunnah and Ḥadith, Jurisprudential sources of all four sects of Fiqh and even form the books of those, on them he has criticized. A very rare and appreciable thing in his writings is that he is unbiased, neutral, careful and moderate person while using pen. In this article the explicit concepts of Sir Sayyed Aḥmed Khān, Ghulām Aḥmad Parvaiz and others have been rejected with the arguments given by Allama Saʻīdī in His Tafsīr Tibyān ul Furqān and the Majority of the Scholars and Muslim thinkers.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28