Assessment of Formality, Innovation and Productivity in Small and Medium Enterprises of Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52461/sabas.v5i2.2482Keywords:
Innovation, Productivity, Learning by doing, Learning by Schooling, SMEs’ GrowthAbstract
This study aims to assess the dynamics of innovation and productivity of formally registered small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. It considers learning by doing and learning by schooling theories along with stylized facts about determinants of firms’ ability to practice innovation. This is the first detailed study that considers learning by doing and learning by schooling aspects of firms determining innovation practices. These are considered building blocks of sustainable economic growth and hence the growth processes of the firms. Realizing the state of these aspects provides valuable support to policymakers in developing effective policies for the manufacturing sector. For this purpose, a structural model is used to assess the factors affecting innovation followed by the effects of innovation on the productivity of the firms with reference to formality. The latest data by World Bank collected through Enterprise Survey between May 2013 to May 2015 is used to address the purpose. It is found that novel organizational and management practices promote the innovation of small and medium firms significantly. It is concluded that higher levels of productivity can be achieved through better organizational structure, employee training, the transformation of the internal structure of the production process, export growth, and the development of the business environment in various locations. These findings imply that export-oriented policies, research, and development for SMEs, training provisions for managers and employees, and changes in the hierarchal structure of the old established enterprises are the key elements for SMEs growth in Pakistan. Therefore, it is suggested to promote positive competition among SMEs as it works as a driving force to bring innovation and enhance the capacity utilization of the firms. It is observed that non-exporting firms are less concerned to adopt innovative practices that limit their productivity and growth. Thus, it is recommended to encourage these firms to grow at the par of their exporting counterparts by following their innovative strategies. These strategies bring direct benefits to the firms in terms of productivity and growth and have the potential to ultimately improve the livelihood and socio-economic status of the associated employees. Moreover, with higher levels of growth informal sector may also catch up with the formal sector through the effect of agglomeration economies of the formal firms located in the region.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1971) The economic implications of learning by doing. In Readings in the Theory of Growth (pp. 131-149). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Arshad, M. and Arshad, D. (2019). Internal capabilities and SMEs performance: A case of textile industry in Pakistan. Management Science Letters, 9 (4), 621–628.
Atuahene-Gima, K. and Evangelista, F. (2000). Cross-functional influence in new product development: An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R… D Perspectives. Management Science, 46(10), 1269–1284.
Balassa, B. (1985). Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock. Journal of Development Economics, 18(1), 23–35.
Barrios, A., Reficco, E. and Taborda, R. (2019) ‘Training effects on subsistence entrepreneurs’ hope and goal attainment’, Education and Training, 61(7/8), 895-917.
Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. (1992). Accumulating technological capability in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(suppl_1), 257–281.
Bhatti, Y. A. and Ventresca, M. (2012). The Emerging Market for Frugal Innovation: Fad, Fashion, or Fit?, SSRN.
Bigsten, A. and Gebreeyesus, M. (2009). Firm productivity and exports: Evidence from Ethiopian manufacturing. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1594-1614.
Boyan, J. (1982). Selection and the Evolution of Industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.
Carpenter, R. E. and Petersen, B. C. (2002). Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 298–309.
Chataway, J., Hanlin, R. and Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation : an architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 33-54.
Coccio, M. (2018). The origin of Economics of Innovation. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 5(1), 9–28.
Crépon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairessec, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115–158.
Crespi, G. and Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290.
Dooley, L., Kenny, B. and O’Sullivan, D. (2017). Innovation capability development: case studies of small enterprises in the LMT manufacturing sector. Small Enterprise Research, 24(3), 233–256.
Dosi, G., Grazzi, M. and Mathew, N. (2017). The cost-quantity relations and the diverse patterns of "learning by doing": Evidence from India. Research Policy, 46(10), 1873-1886.
Ellery, R. and Sala, S. E. B. (1999). Learning-by-Doing and Schooling. Instituto de Pesquisa em Economia Aplicada–IPEA.
Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M. and Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation and economic development. UNU-MERIT (Vol. 32). Working paper series.
Forsman, H. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40(5), 739–750.
Fu, X., Mohnen, P. and Zanello, G. (2018). Innovation and productivity in formal and informal firms in Ghana. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 315–325.
Goedhuys, M., Janz, N. and Mohnen, P. (2008). What drives productivity in Tanzanian manufacturing firms: technology or business environment?. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 199-218.
Goedhuys, M., Janz, N. and Mohnen, P. (2013). Knowledge-based productivity in “low-tech” industries: evidence from firms in developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 1-23.
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT press.
Hall, B. H., Lotti, F. and Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13-33.
Harvie, C. (2019). Enterprises ( MSMEs ): Challenges , Opportunities and Sustainability in East Asia, in Trade Logistics in Landlocked and Resource Cursed Asian Countries (pp. 155-174). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Hungund, S. and Mani, V. (2019). Benchmarking of factors influencing adoption of innovation in software product SMEs: An empirical evidence from India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(5), 1451-1468.
Hurley, R. F. and Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
Janz, N., Lööf, H. and Peters, B. (2003). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity- Is there a Common Story Across Countries?.
Khawaja, I. and Iqbal, N. (2019). Determinants of Expansion of Micro and Small Firms and State of Entrepreneurship in Pakistan (No. 2019:160). Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amrican Economic Review, 86(3). 562–583.
Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-186.
Lee, C. and Narjoko, D. (2015). Escaping the Middle‐Income Trap in Southeast Asia: Micro Evidence on Innovation, Productivity, and Globalization. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(1), 124–147.
Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (1992). Innovation and competitive advantage: What we know and what we need to learn. Journal of management, 18(2), 399-429.
Li, Y. and Rama, M. (2015). Firm Dynamics, Productivity Growth, and Job Creation in Developing Countries: The Role of Micro-and Small Enterprises. The World Bank Research Observer, 30(1), 3-38.
Lucas Jr., R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–4.
Lundvall, B. Å. ed (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. The learning economy and the economics of hope, 85.
Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1129-1155). North-Holland.
Mano, Y., Iddrisu, A., Yoshino, Y., & Sonobe, T. (2012). How can micro and small enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa become more productive? The impacts of experimental basic managerial training. World Development, 40(3), 458-468.
Masood Ul, H., Iqbal, Z. and Malik, M. (2018). Exploring the role of technological developments and open innovation in the survival of SMEs : an empirical study of Pakistan. Int. J. Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, 4(1), 64–85.
McCartney, B. (2011). Developing a Sustainable SME Banking Franchise in Pakistan: Best Practices and Policy Insights.
No Kieser, A. and Koch, U. (2008). Bounded rationality and organizational learning based on rule changes. Management Learning. 39(3), 329-347.
Norling, N. and Swanström, N. (2007). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, trade, and the roles of Iran, India and Pakistan. Central Asian Survey, 26(3), 429–444.
OECD (2005). Oslo manual. Paris and Luxembourg: OECD/Euro-stat, na dan, 19, 2021.
Ophem, H. V., Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A., & Mohnen, P. (2002). The mutual relation between patents and R&D. In Innovation and firm performance (pp. 56-70). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Pešalj, B., Pavlov, A., & Micheli, P. (2018). The use of management control and performance measurement systems in SMEs: A levers of control perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(11), 2169-2191.
Raza, S., Minai, M. S., Zain, A. Y. M., Tariq, T. A., & Khuwaja, F. M. (2018). Dissection of small businesses in pakistan: issues and directions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(4), 1–13.
Robson, P. J., Haugh, H. M. and Obeng, B. A. (2009). Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: enterprising Africa. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 331–350.
Romer, D. and Chow, C. (1996). Advanced Macroeconomic Theory. Mcgraw-hill.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change, Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.
Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., & Giovando, G. (2018). How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 561–574.
Saulina, M. (2016). Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(2), 162-176.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934). Transaction Publishers.–1982.–January, 1, 244.
Sissoko, M., & Castiaux, A. (2018). How does frugal innovation emerge and lead to sustainability in developing countries. A case study in Malian agricultural areas. How does frugal innovation emerge and lead to sustainability in developing countries, 1-22.
Subhan, Q. A., Mahmood, T. and Sattar, A. (2014). Innovation and economic development: A Case of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 52(2), 159–174.
Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8),.892-902.
Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes. Journal of business venturing. 21(5), 687–703.
Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2016). The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(5), 884-912
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mamona Sadaf, Nadia Hassan, Muhammad Ijaz Latif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors submitting and publishing in SABAS agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in SABAS retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially.
